Hidden ambiguity on Cenvat credit on rent-a-cab

Hidden ambiguity on Cenvat credit on rent-a-cab

Refusing to CENVAT credit on rent-a-cab services is good for revenue officers. Period till 01.04.2011, courts and tribunals allowed the credit however with action of specific exclusion in the definition of ‘Input service’ so as to disallow the credit on rent-a-cab services, most of the assessee’s became ineligible for the credit from the year 2011 onwards.

The relevant part of ‘input service’ definition reads below :-

(B) services provided by way of rent-a-cab of a motor vehicle, in so far as they relate to a motor vehicle which is not a capital goods”

Thus the eligibility is linked with definition of ‘capital goods’ and in short, credit of rent-a-cab is eligible if the cab is capital goods.

And the relevant parts of ‘capital goods’ definition reads as under (as relevant to cab/motor vehicle):

“(C) Motor vehicle designed to carry passengers including their chassis, registered in the name of the provider of service, when used for providing output service of –

(i) Transportation of passengers; or

(ii) Renting of such motor vehicle; or

(iii) Imparting motor driving skills;”

As looks the above, to treat rent-a-cab (motor vehicle that transports passengers or persons) as capital goods, there are two conditions to be meet out

cab should be used for specified services,It should must be registered in the name of service provider
On reading of Capital goods , it is clear that if the vehicle is registered & used for provision of specified services then cab is Capital Goods in all other cases it is not Capital goods, which gives impression that manufactures will never get credit of excise duty paid on such passenger motor vehicle even if they used solely for factory.

Further in case vehicle was taken on financial lease basis and vehicle is registered in the name of ‘financier’ then even vehicle is used for providing specified services, it will be not be a Capital Goods in the hands of assessee owing to mandate of registration in the name of service provider’ in the Capital Goods Definition. Hence duty paid on such financed vehicle becomes cost & may require to be factored in lease instalments.

As stated supra the IS def was linked to Capital goods which leaves impression that credit of service tax paid on cab rentals charges will be eligible if the cabs are ‘CG’ but there seems to be some anomalies here as the definitions of Input Services and Capital Goods were not synchronized in Proper way.

One of condition to treat cab/vehicle as Capital Goods is that it should be registered in the name of ‘service provider’. The question now arises is that vehicle can be registered in the name of service provider only if he is the owner and once he owns it then what is the need of taking the vehicle on rent basis?.

One can say that this should be construed to mean that if the person,Who is taking vehicle on hire purchases is also eligible to take of credit as Capital Goods then services of cab rentals also eligible. But mandate of ‘registering the vehicle in the name of service provider’ would block this interpretation since such registration is inescapable condition for deciding the eligibility as ‘CG’. However it may be viewed that condition of ‘registration’ shall be limited only in the context of taking ‘CG’ credit & said condition may be ignored while determining the eligibility of Input Services. Through this view, credit may not eligible except to the service providers specified therein.

There is other possible view about the eligibility of Capital Goods including registration shall be seen in the hands of person providing the service of ‘cab rental’ and not in the hands of person receiving the service. If this interpretation is adopted, most of the assessee’s (including manufactures) would get the credit. Here assessee should check every time whether vehicle registration was in the name of his vendor.

With the above possible contrary views, still there are possibilities of getting CENVAT credit on rent-a-cab service even after 2011 amendment. With a view not to loose the credit especially due to one year time limit, it is advisable to avail credit initially & reverse it under protest with intimation to department. After expiry of certain period, same can be availed back.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

fourteen − 1 =